sub rosa

17 September 2007

Watched the ‘palimpsest of Umberto Eco’s novel The Name of the Rose,’ over the weekend, and it was as good as I remembered. I was a little disappointed that the film didn’t focus a little more on what I thought was one of the most interesting, though indirect, themes of the book.


Brother William of Baskerville is unusual because of his break from dogmas of knowledge, both sacred and profane. Almost omnipresent in the book and almost absent from the movie was Eco’s interplay between the borderline heresy and ultimate utility of modern infidel knowledge (e.g., optics in the form of spectacles) and the frame story, a deeply layered historical text. The best knowledge is modern, but the best stories are ancient? I’m not sure what he might be saying.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: